AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 1078.8x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 8931
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 8931
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1408
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6579 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27105 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 22 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 333 | 330 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
IntelArc A370M
