AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R7 M465
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R7 M465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 4725.9x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
- 3.7x more pipelines: 1408 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2535
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2535
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 7339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2535 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 vs 7339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R7 M465 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | 7339 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1095 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R7 M465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Litho |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 1086 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 960 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |