AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 607.6x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45563 vs 28293
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 7 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3342 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45563 vs 28293 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1408
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9943
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9943
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1408 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 9943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 9943 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 10021 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45563 | 28293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9528 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK110B |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 7 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 404 | 407 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 928 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 875 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 210 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 336 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |