AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 928 MHz
607.6x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 28211

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz vs 928 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3342
Geekbench - OpenCL	45724 vs 28211

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1408
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9943
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9943

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1408
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10021 vs 9943
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10021 vs 9943

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

10021

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

45724

28211

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943	10021
Geekbench - OpenCL	45724	28211
PassMark - G3D Mark		9517
PassMark - G2D Mark		635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3338

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Navi 14	GK110B
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	7 November 2013
Place in performance rating	400	397
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		14.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	928 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	875 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	2880
Pixel fill rate	46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s	210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2880
Floating-point performance		5,345 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	336 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA