AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 928 MHz
  • 607.6x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45563 vs 28293
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 928 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3342
Geekbench - OpenCL 45563 vs 28293

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

  • 2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1408
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9943
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9943
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2880 vs 1408
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10021 vs 9943
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10021 vs 9943

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
10021
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
45563
28293
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 10021
Geekbench - OpenCL 45563 28293
PassMark - G3D Mark 9528
PassMark - G2D Mark 633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3365

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 14 GK110B
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 7 November 2013
Place in performance rating 404 407
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $749.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.80

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 928 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 875 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 2880
Pixel fill rate 46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s 210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2880
Floating-point performance 5,345 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 336 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA