AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9309 vs 5157
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9309 vs 5157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 vs 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3716
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3716
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3358
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 7859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 7859 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2411 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Ellesmere | GM107 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 403 | 475 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V8650
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 370
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
