AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1664
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9309 vs 6291
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9309 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1664 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 2,573 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3332 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | GM204 |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 29 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 406 | 534 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 773 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 2,573 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |