AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
- Around 48% better floating-point performance: 153.6 gflops vs 104 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 310 vs 136
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.35 vs 0.16
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.88 vs 10.124
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 587 vs 344
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 750 vs 666
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1457
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 587 vs 344
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 750 vs 666
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 4 February 2010 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 310 vs 136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 vs 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 vs 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 vs 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 vs 1457 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 267 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 94
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1568
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 267 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 vs 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1568 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 310 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1568 | 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 106.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 | 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 | 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 | 1457 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Beema | Cedar |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 4 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1609 | 1606 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 267 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |