AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 7310

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 7310 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 304 vs 129
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 95 vs 44
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 750 vs 736
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1230
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 750 vs 736
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1230
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2015 vs 1 May 2012
Pipelines 128 vs 80
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 304 vs 129
PassMark - G2D Mark 95 vs 44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 750 vs 736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1745 vs 1230
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 750 vs 736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1745 vs 1230

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7310

  • Around 87% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 267 MHz
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1780 vs 1492
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 500 MHz vs 267 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1780 vs 1492

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7310

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
304
129
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
95
44
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1492
1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
750
736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1745
1230
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
750
736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1745
1230
Name AMD Radeon R3 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 7310
PassMark - G3D Mark 304 129
PassMark - G2D Mark 95 44
Geekbench - OpenCL 1492 1780
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 106.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.35
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 21.88
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 750 736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1745 1230
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 750 736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1745 1230

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R3 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 7310

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Terascale 2
Code name Beema Zacate
Launch date 28 January 2015 1 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1599 1600
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 600 MHz
Core clock speed 267 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 153.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 128 80
Texture fill rate 4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 930 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type System Shared
Shared memory 1