AMD Radeon R5 230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 2 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 224 vs 160
Pipelines | 224 vs 160 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
Code name | Caicos | NB9E-GTX |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1319 | not rated |
Price now | $50 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 224 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1508 Million |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |