AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8610G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 626 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 1463
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 707
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 707
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 533 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 626 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 1463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 707 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8610G
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1868 vs 1841
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1868 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3260
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1868 vs 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1868 vs 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8610G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 1463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 1868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 1868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 407 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8610G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Oland | Richland |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1322 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 626 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 533 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 |