AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7955 vs 5684
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2097 vs 1645
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3127 vs 2426
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 1677
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2097 vs 1645
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3127 vs 2426
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7955 vs 5684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 7955 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 6862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Oland |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 807 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |