AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 289
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 152
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 790
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 540
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1044
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1702
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 540
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1044
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 | 790 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Caicos |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Place in performance rating | 1236 | 1491 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 160 |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 370 million |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |