AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6370M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 6370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon HD 6370M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 320 vs 80
4.2x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 120 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 276
Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 2744
7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.171
6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 281
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1297
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1885
6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 281
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1297
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1885

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 October 2013 vs 26 November 2010
Texture fill rate	15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 80
Floating-point performance	499.2 gflops vs 120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	902 vs 276
Geekbench - OpenCL	5331 vs 2744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.262 vs 0.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1688 vs 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2342 vs 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 1885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1688 vs 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2342 vs 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 1885

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370M

4.5x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 274

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	11 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	401 vs 274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6370M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

902

276

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

274

401

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5331

2744

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.262

0.171

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1688

281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2342

1297

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1885

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1688

281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2342

1297

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1885

Name	AMD Radeon R7 240	AMD Radeon HD 6370M
PassMark - G3D Mark	902	276
PassMark - G2D Mark	274	401
Geekbench - OpenCL	5331	2744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.262	0.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1688	281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2342	1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	1885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1688	281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2342	1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	1885
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 240	AMD Radeon HD 6370M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Oland	Robson
Design	AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date	8 October 2013	26 November 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$69
Place in performance rating	1236	1238
Price now	$49.99
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	24.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz
Floating-point performance	499.2 gflops	120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	320	80
Stream Processors	320
Texture fill rate	15.6 GTexel / s	6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	11 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	292 million
Core clock speed		750 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	N / A
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1150 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync