AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 115 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3190 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | Bonaire |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 649 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $239 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |