AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 180 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 84 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,688 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4870 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Curacao |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 453 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $399 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |