AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 317
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1000 vs 254
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 21 August 2006 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 317 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1000 vs 254 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 317 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1000 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Curie |
Code name | Oland | G71 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 21 August 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 506 | 498 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |