AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5809 vs 2422
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 119
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 608 vs 438
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 vs 2422 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 vs 438 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 1616
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 1616
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1704
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 | 2422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1616 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1616 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3329 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 | 438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Opal | GF117 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1169 | 1172 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |