AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
  • Around 8% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 193
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 21 March 2014
Core clock speed 725 MHz vs 575 MHz
Boost clock speed 825 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 223 vs 193

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8851 vs 5809
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1616
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1616
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1704
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1704
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1146 vs 608
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8851 vs 5809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214 vs 1704
PassMark - G3D Mark 1146 vs 608

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5809
8851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1616
1765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1616
1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1704
3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1704
3214
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
223
193
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
608
1146
Name AMD Radeon R7 A360 AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Geekbench - OpenCL 5809 8851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1616 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1616 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1704 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1704 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark 223 193
PassMark - G3D Mark 608 1146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 A360 AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Opal Venus
Launch date 5 May 2015 21 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1169 1170
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 825 MHz 625 MHz
Core clock speed 725 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s 25 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,500 million
Compute units 10

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1125 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore