AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 193
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 21 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 193 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8851 vs 5809
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1616
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1616
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1704
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1704
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1146 vs 608
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8851 vs 5809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1704 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1146 vs 608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 | 8851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1616 | 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1616 | 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 193 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 | 1146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 A360 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Venus |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1169 | 1170 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||


