AMD Radeon R8 M535DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 305M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M535DX and NVIDIA GeForce 305M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4620 vs 1987
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 182 vs 149
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 670 vs 151
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 10 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4620 vs 1987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 182 vs 149 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 670 vs 151 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 305M
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 305M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R8 M535DX | NVIDIA GeForce 305M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4620 | 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 182 | 149 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 670 | 151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX | NVIDIA GeForce 305M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | GT218 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 916 | 1331 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 891 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 36.8 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 55 | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |