AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon X800 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and ATI Radeon X800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 425 MHz
  • 30.2x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 3.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
  • 3.9x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • 51.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 130
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 384
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 September 2014 vs 4 October 2004
Core clock speed 918 MHz vs 425 MHz
Texture fill rate 102.8 GTexel / s vs 3.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 130 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6680 vs 130
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6680
130
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
597
384
Name AMD Radeon R9 285 ATI Radeon X800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark 6680 130
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2778

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 285 ATI Radeon X800 SE

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 R400
Code name Tonga R423
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date 2 September 2014 4 October 2004
Launch price (MSRP) $249
Place in performance rating 442 445
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 918 MHz 425 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,290 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 130 nm
Pipelines 1792
Texture fill rate 102.8 GTexel / s 3.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 190 Watt
Transistor count 5,000 million 160 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin None

API support

DirectX 12 9.0c
OpenGL 4.5 2.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 176.0 GB / s 44.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR

Technologies

HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)