NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 918 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
• Around 33% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 3,290 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 190 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 72.799
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1474.632
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 6.369
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 391.399
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 6474
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 6474

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 6608
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 247
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 vs 76.32
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3043 vs 1860
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2782 vs 1680
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3043 vs 1860
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2782 vs 1680
• 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2778 vs 899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6608 6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	247 597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 2778

Compare specifications (specs)