AMD Radeon R9 350 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 15 February 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 9926
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 vs 2609
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 vs 2609
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 3911
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 3911
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 9664
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 9664
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 vs 9926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 vs 2609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 vs 2609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 vs 3911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 vs 3911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 vs 9664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 vs 9664 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 14263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 4524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 4524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 14630 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 14630 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | GCN 1.0 |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 15 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 585 | 557 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | Cape Verde | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,280 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 40 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |