AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 3881
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 3881
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 6631
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 6631
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 6631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 6631 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 9926
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 2609
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 9926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 12475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 6631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 6631 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Pascal |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 583 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Code name | GP107 | |
| Price now | $176.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
