AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M365X and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M365X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 vs 397
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1482 vs 628
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 vs 397 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1482 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M365X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M365X | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36410 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 | 397 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1482 | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tropo | R600 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 380 | 381 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 720 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |