AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 653.2x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 348 vs 292
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 vs 292 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1219 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1219 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 1592.5x better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 1952
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17470 vs 9416
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2296
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2296
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1219 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1219 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 1952 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 vs 9416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 2296 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 292 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1952 | 4462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 17470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 3721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Cape Verde | GP106B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 642 | 643 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,911 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |