AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 125 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 6.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 2174
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 462
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 506.712
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 3.01
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 49.787
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 3707
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 3707

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 40 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• 1066.7x better floating-point performance: 1,280 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 11610
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 vs 33.507
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 vs 140.911
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 940
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 2158
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 940
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 2158
• 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 vs 127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 2174
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 14263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 33.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 506.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 3.01
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 49.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 153.657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 14630
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 14630
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 711

Compare specifications (specs)