NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 939.2x better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 33.507
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 140.911
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2158
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2158
- 7.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 2259
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 213
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 9584
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 495.238
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.365
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 38.965
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 4330
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 4330
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 38.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 4330 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 2690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GP108 | Lexa |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 876 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 2,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||