AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 830
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 253
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 2902
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 10.872
- 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 166.832
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 0.817
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 12.415
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 36.916
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1951
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1951
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1951 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 577.3x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 940
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2158
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 940
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2158
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 vs 127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Lexa | GF108 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 18 June 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $59.99 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 1311 |
Price now | $75 | $54.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 20.48 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |