AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 162.36 GT/s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
- Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 152 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2560 MB
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8785 vs 1958
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 391
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44380 vs 7339
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 2602
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3104
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3316
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 2602
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3104
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 23 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s vs 22.57 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 152 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2560 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 vs 1958 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 391 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 vs 7339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3316 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 | 1958 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 391 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 | 7339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3316 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.451 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 511.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.065 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 46.591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Fermi |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 23 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 970 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | GF100 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $268 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 513 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 22.57 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 152 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Pipelines | 352 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2560 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |