AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 3403.106
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 136.919
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 1010.818
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 vs 7856
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 vs 7856 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- 895.7x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85558 vs 66235
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 209.509
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 21.941
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 11536
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 11536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 vs 66235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 21.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 11536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66235 | 85558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 282.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 24.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $899 |
| Place in performance rating | 177 | 195 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Render output units | 64 | 64 |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Texture Units | 144 | 144 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | 13600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
