NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- 1194x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 14385
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11536
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 14385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 11536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 705
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3346
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 14385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3723 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 8492 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 186 | 188 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | IGP | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |