NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • 1194x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
  • Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 14498
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11536
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11536
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 14498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 11536

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 705
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3346
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3346
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1465 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 889 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3366 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3366 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
889
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
14498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
11536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3366
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3366
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3723
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 889
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 14498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3366
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3366
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3723
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 8500
Geekbench - OpenCL 66234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 209.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3686.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 250
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1036.448

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5700

Essentials

Architecture Turing RDNA
Code name TU104 Navi 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 7 July 2019
Place in performance rating 175 177
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $350

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1725 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1465 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS 15.9 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS 7.95 TFLOPs
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s 110.4 GP/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 248.4 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10.3 B
Compute units 36
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2304
Texture Units 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin
Width IGP
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.0 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready