AMD Radeon RX 570X vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570X and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 95 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1579.7x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8697 vs 7400
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8697 vs 7400
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 464
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2108 vs 14 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8697 vs 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8697 vs 7400 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 464 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- 632.5x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3101
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3101
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4096 vs 1923
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 vs 38939
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3345 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4096 vs 1923 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 vs 38939 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570X | AMD FirePro W8000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8697 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8697 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3101 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3101 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 464 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1923 | 4096 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38939 | 82941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570X | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2108 | 14 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 337 | 409 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1244 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 176 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |