AMD Radeon RX 570X vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570X and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 90 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 1644.9x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 457
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38939 vs 32521
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2108 vs 21 February 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38939 vs 32521 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1244 MHz
- 607.5x better floating-point performance: 3,098 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 8697
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 8697
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3101
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3101
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8920 vs 1923
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1244 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 8697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3345 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 vs 1923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570X | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8697 | 12948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8697 | 12948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3101 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3101 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 457 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1923 | 8920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38939 | 32521 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570X | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2108 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 337 | 334 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1244 MHz | 1476 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 1328 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 3,098 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 96.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 168.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |