AMD Radeon RX 580X vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580X and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 502.5x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11616 vs 11029
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11616 vs 11029
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 588
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11616 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11616 vs 11029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 588 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 1981.9x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 4909
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 4909
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10972 vs 7798
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 4909 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 vs 7798 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580X | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11616 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11616 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 588 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7798 | 10972 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580X | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Vega 10 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 171 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 12,288 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |