AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 887.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 7 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2775
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 3278
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 3278
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 vs 3278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 vs 3278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 5405 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1954 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | GF110 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 809 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 732 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 3800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |