AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 640

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2524
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2524

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278 vs 2524

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1769
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1769
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2775
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2775
Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 10390
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 339
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1954

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 2775
Geekbench - OpenCL	14535 vs 10390
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 339
PassMark - G3D Mark	2428 vs 1954

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3274

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

3274

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

2524

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

2524

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10390

14535

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

339

444

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1954

2428

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	2524
Geekbench - OpenCL	10390	14535
PassMark - G2D Mark	339	444
PassMark - G3D Mark	1954	2428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		100.658

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Polaris
Code name	Arctic Islands	Lexa
Launch date	13 May 2019	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	810	812
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Type		Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1082 MHz
Compute units	8	10
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS	1,385 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s	17.31 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	34.62 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	2200 million
Stream Processors		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)	6.6" (168 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
Height		Half Height
API support
DirectX	12	12.0
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
AMD Eyefinity