AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- 1279.4x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17137 vs 16640
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 13211
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17137 vs 16640
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 13211
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 vs 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 vs 13211 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15149 vs 13316
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 vs 544
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89068 vs 87705
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 16764
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 16764
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15149 vs 13316 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 vs 544 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89068 vs 87705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 16764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 16764 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13316 | 15149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 544 | 836 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87705 | 89068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 22 | GP100 |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 83 | 88 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |