AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2105 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17137 vs 16162
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 3719
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 16764 vs 3373
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17137 vs 16162
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 3719
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 16764 vs 3373
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2105 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22124 vs 13338
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 982 vs 545
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 128896 vs 87706
- Around 45% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16237 vs 11186
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22124 vs 13338 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 vs 545 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 128896 vs 87706 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16237 vs 11186 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13338 | 22124 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 982 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87706 | 128896 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11186 | 16237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800M | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 80 | 79 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 60 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |