AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 14.7x more pipelines: 704 vs 48
- 11.7x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 15 May 2018 vs 12 October 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1167 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Raven | G94B |
Launch date | 15 May 2018 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1453 | 1419 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | |
Price now | $43.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz |