AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 784 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 7 Jan 2018 vs 22 July 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- 10.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 128
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 244
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4327 vs 506
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 vs 3208
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 128 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 244 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 vs 506 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 vs 3208 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 509 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 506 | 4327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3208 | 12186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Kepler |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2018 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 949 | 684 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 784 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 1344 |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 3,540 million |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |