AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 13,738 gflops vs 2x 5,120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops vs 2x 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 5x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 4096
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 4096 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Grenada |
Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 3 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 267 | 266 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | 2x 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |