NVIDIA A30 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A30 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A30
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 751.5x more texture fill rate: 322.6 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3584 |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A30
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
| Name | NVIDIA A30 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 127071 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA A30 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GA100 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 99 | 97 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1677 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1406 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 5.161 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.32 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 138.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 322.6 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 54200 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 933.1 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 3072 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2e | HBM2 |
