AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 M270DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 233
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 962
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 11 June 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 233 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 vs 962 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 233 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 962 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Vega | Topaz |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 665 | 667 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,500 million | 3,100 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR4 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |

