AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega | Lexa |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 11 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 39.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 2,200 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |