AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs ATI Mobility Radeon X300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and ATI Mobility Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.7x more boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 46.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1584 vs 34
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 204
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 November 2005 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 204 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X300
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 204 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Owl | M22 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 950 | 861 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 107 million |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 250 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | 64 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PCIe |