ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Comparative analysis of ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Launch date | 26 January 2004 vs 22 December 2003 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 425 MHz vs 250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
Core clock speed | 425 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI All-In-Wonder 9200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Name | ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rage 7 | Curie |
Code name | RV280 | MCP51 |
Launch date | 26 January 2004 | 22 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 638 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 36 million | 75 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | PCI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 1.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR |