ATI FireGL T2-64S vs ATI FireGL X2-256T
Comparative analysis of ATI FireGL T2-64S and ATI FireGL X2-256T videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL T2-64S
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL X2-256T
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 412 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 3.3 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- 4x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 64 MB
- Around 69% higher memory clock speed: 688 MHz vs 406 MHz
Core clock speed | 412 MHz vs 324 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.3 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 688 MHz vs 406 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FireGL T2-64S | ATI FireGL X2-256T | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rage 8 | Rage 9 |
Code name | RV350 | R360 |
Launch date | 1 October 2003 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 324 MHz | 412 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.296 GTexel / s | 3.3 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 76 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x LFH60 | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.496 GB / s | 22.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 406 MHz | 688 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR2 |