ATI FireGL T2-64S vs ATI Radeon 9550
Comparative analysis of ATI FireGL T2-64S and ATI Radeon 9550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL T2-64S
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 324 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 1.296 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 406 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 324 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.296 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 406 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FireGL T2-64S
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9550
Name | ATI FireGL T2-64S | ATI Radeon 9550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 35 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FireGL T2-64S | ATI Radeon 9550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rage 8 | Rage 8 |
Code name | RV350 | RV350 |
Launch date | 1 October 2003 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1132 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 324 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.296 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 76 million | 76 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x LFH60 | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.496 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 406 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR |