ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 57.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 463 vs 8
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 6 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 vs 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 vs 247 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
- 37x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | 247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Rankine |
Code name | M96 | NV34 A1 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 698 | 700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 514 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |