AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 1792 vs 320
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 10.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 463
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 375
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2907
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 August 2012 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 vs 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2907 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 | 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | 375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | M96 |
Launch date | 24 August 2012 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 696 | 698 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |