ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 11 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 50x more pipelines: 400 vs 8
- 21.2x better floating-point performance: 440.0 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 4 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1937 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1937 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Madison | G98 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 4 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1389 | 1391 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | |
Price now | $69.78 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 11 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR, GDDR3, GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |